Featured Articles (Scroll Down for More)
Personal News
All Recent Articles
0

High Technology for Low Fidelity

I avoided cameraphones for a while. I’d rather have a device that worked exceptionally well as a phone without a lens than a mediocre phone that takes mediocre, low-resolution digital photographs. Eventually, I relented and purchased the original Motorola DROID. The phone comes with a mediocre camera, bust most of that mediocrity can be hidden using applications that process the photograph. There is a subset of applications that attempt to mimic the classic toy-camera look.

Plastic “toy” cameras, like the Holga and Diana, incorporate unpredictability into the art of photography. In general, photographers seek to control everything about their images, particularly lighting and composition. Much of this is left to chance when using toy cameras. Their imprecise construction allowed light to leak onto the film, adding streaks of color or light at locations. Focusing is imprecise, and vignetting is a virtue to be appreciated, not avoided.

Modern apps like those available for the Android operating system and the iPhone allow precise customization over these random imperfections, but that takes the fun out this particular type of art. Even when choosing a “random” setting in these applications, you are left with the knowledge that the image is a lie. The phone, despite not being the best digital camera available, is capable of better photographs. Real plastic Holgas and Dianas produce these images as a result of the only type of image processing they are capable of — the photograph you take is their best work. They are low-fidelity, not just “slumming it.”

The problem today is that despite the fact that these toy cameras can be found for just about $20, it’s still less expensive in the long run to fake the look with your phone, a decide you might have anyway. The costs of buying and developing film add up quickly. The cameras once designed as an affordable option for kids is now out of reach for many photographers. One can’t forget that with digital photography, photographers have the luxury of instant review and retake.

With the added complication of processing film, I’ve only been slowly working with my Holga so far. Amy shot the first roll (black and white) with the Diana today; it will be a few days before I see the resulting negatives. Here is a selection from the Holga. More are available in the Toy Camera set on Flickr. I should point out that the pattern of white dots seems to be a result of the developing process. I’ll speak to the lab about this when I go to pick up the next rolls of film they’re currently developing. Keep reading for some of my recent photographs using the Holga.

Read the rest of this entry »

3

Sourland Mountain, Somerset County

On Sunday, I spent the afternoon walking around Sourland Mountain Preserve in Somerset County, New Jersey. This was my first time at the location, and the entrance is not far from where I live. I’m not sure how many miles I walked while at the preserve, but I spent some time walking up and down part of the mountain, mostly in a clearing. I also spent some time walking trails amongst the trees. A pond nearby was populated with three families of geese, and two of these families included a number of goslings.

Most people think New Jersey is flat. Much of New Jersey is, but the state does have its share of hills and mountains, and Sourland Mountain is a great example. As I climbed higher, I could see the houses of Hillsborough in the distance.

I brought my Canon 1D Mark III with me. On hand was a Canon 70-200mm f/4L and the original 2x extender I borrowed from a friend. In addition to this combination, I shot with the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 and briefly with the Canon 50mm f/1.4. The preserve is a great location, and I’d like to come back for portraiture.

The full gallery is on Flickr, and I’ve included a few more photographs after the jump.

Read the rest of this entry »

0

Waiting in a Doctor Who Fan Line, or: Real Men Don’t Squeeeee

I received late word that the cast, executive producers, director, and head writer/showrunner of Doctor Who would be in New York City to promote the new series premiering soon with an event sponsored by television station BBC America — like the BBC, but with commercials interrupting shows designed not to be interrupted. This special event Monday night featured the world premiere of the first story (two episodes) of the new series, before the official airing on April 23, 2011 in the United States and the United Kingdom. The screening was followed by a question and answer session with a panel composed of the individual listed above.

Thinking the event would be only slightly more popular than last year’s, I planned to line up in front of the theater hosting the event in the early afternoon. After checking updates on Facebook in the morning, I realized that I needed to get into Manhattan early or else miss my chance to get in. I also planned to hold a spot for M-D as well, which was unfortunately a fruitless effort. I arrived in line around 9:30 am, and I was already number 450 in line for an event that supposedly had a capacity for 500. Many people in line in front of me camped out the night before; others were waiting since midnight. Despite being a fan of Doctor Who in some form since at least 1981, I was clearly not the biggest fan there. I wasn’t even dressed in costume like about 50% of the other enthusiasts.

I’m quite fine with that. The relationship between “fan” and “object of fan’s affection” is weird. I don’t like relating to people at significantly disparate levels. It’s awkward and strange. People seem to be fanatic about science fiction actors — more so than athletes. Fanaticism is so strong that these individuals say ridiculous things and ask pointless questions at Q&A sessions. To British and Scottish individuals in the television industry, these vocal representatives of my country can be embarrassing.

In a perfect world, I would be able to relate to individuals I admire on a professional level. I’m not in the television industry, however, so that is unlikely. Unless you’re a teenage girl, it’s just not OK to gush over popular individuals.

The first two episodes of the new Doctor Who series are not without their flaws, but they will be a fantastic way to start off what will be an exciting series with interesting stories, wrenching drama, and new monsters. In the theater during the screening, there was almost as many, “Huh?!” reactions as enthusiastic cheers. Afterwards, writer Steven Moffat begged us not to reveal too much about the show (spoilers!), so I’ll just say that I’m not quite sure how viewers will be able to stand waiting one week between episodes one and two.

After the break is one of the many trailers for the new series.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags:
0

Lighting and Photography Class

A week before this past Tuesday, I attended the penultimate session of my latest photography class. The class concentrated on lighting, and it was perfect timing for me. Lighting was the missing piece in my skill set — well, besides the need to improve my artistic eye. We invited a model to the class in order to practice our lighting technique for portraits. While my classmates spent a lot of time snapping photos with 35mm cameras, my process was much slower because I was using the Mamiya RZ67 for the most part.

I started the session with the Polaroid back to test the exposure before switching to the 120 medium format film. I also got a few shots in using the Canon 1D Mark III. (It’s wonderful that I was able to find all of this equipment used. The only piece of equipment I purchased new was the Sigma 24-70mm lens I mentioned earlier.) Out of everything, the Polaroid “test shots” turned out the best, despite losing one exposure when I removed the back before replacing the dark slide. With the Polaroid back on, I also tried shooting with the f-stop halfway between f/22 and f/32, and that didn’t work so well. It resulted in the shutter not opening much at all, which you can see in the most underexposed shot in the group.

It’s interesting how, despite using the same settings, the Kodak Ektar film responded completely differently to the light on the seamless backdrop.

The next class starts in May, but I think I’ll be taking a break from classes until at least the fall. I need to spend more time shooting.

Here is the full set on Flickr, and if you continue reading this article, you’ll see a gallery of just the Polaroids and one 6×7.

Read the rest of this entry »

0

Where is Today’s Counterculture in Music?

Sir Bob Geldof was Craig Ferguson’s guest on The Late Late Show last night. I watched the interview earlier today. Craig had seen Bob perform with the Boomtown Rats in 1977, at a time and in a location featuring social unrest. Young people, particularly young musicians, had an opportunity to react to popular culture and its musical interpretation (disco, pop) with punk music. Throughout the twentieth century, after the technology for performing and recording music became accessible, the younger generation used it to rebel against the status quo. Punk rock, and particularly the thoughtful punk rockers like Bob Geldof and John Lydon, shaped this counterculture.

In the interview, Bob and Craig agree that we are experiencing a formative period in history, one that will be viewed by historians centuries in the future. Thanks to social unrest throughout the world, money flowing into emerging markets, and dominant global power shifting away from the United States, society may be at a tipping point. I don’t think anyone can properly identify what history will choose to focus on until well after the fact, but assuming it’s true, where is today’s counterculture? Specifically, where is the music that can be identified as representative of today’s social change? Why does no one have anything to say about this?

Commercialism is quick to latch onto anything new these days, and that may be why none of today’s music seems revolutionary. A counterculture is commercialized so quickly — take hip-hop, for example — that it doesn’t have time to stand for something and no longer means anything. With artists concerned about making a living in this country, there isn’t a lot of opportunity to do something untested. Maybe we need to start looking elsewhere to find the next social movement to become representative of a generation, perhaps the Middle East, north Africa, or China.

Bob mentions how terrible the popular music was at that time, and there had to be a change. Today’s pop music should generate the same sort of reaction, but where are today’s music rebels? Watch the interview with Bob Geldof after the break.

Read the rest of this entry »

Page 1 of 612345...Last »